| В. Б. Шепелева СЮЖЕТ ИЗ ИСТОРИИ СОВЕТСКОГО ИСТОРИЧЕСКОГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ И РАЗРАБОТКИ К. Н. ТАРНОВСКОГО | |
| Шепелева Валентина Борисовна1 | |
| 1.1Омский государственный университет им. Ф.М. Достоевского | |
| Дата поступления 2024.02.20 | Аннотация. В контексте постнеклассики рассматривается неудовлетворительная ситуация в системе исторического образования в условиях оттепели по материалам дискуссии советских историков, в центре внимания которой оказались вопросы подготовки научно-педагогических кадров. Обобщением наработок по проблеме занимался К. Н. Тарновский – историк, учёный и педагог. Помимо критики негативных сторон историко-образовательной реальности, он предложил свои варианты решения выявленных задач. Показывается глубокая комплиментарность идей К. Н. Тарновского требованиям советского проекта, а историческая наука обнаруживает себя как существенное средство национальной безопасности. |
| Ключевые слова научно-педагогические работники, Совещание историков, история, историческое образование, вызов времени, эпоха осознанной необходимости, ответственность историков | |
Библиография | |
Сведения о финансировании и благодарности | |
| V.B. Shepeleva STORY FROM THE HISTORY OF SOVIET HISTORICAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENTS BY K.N. TARNOVSKY | |
| Shepeleva Valentina B. 1 | |
| 1.1Dostoevsky Omsk State University | |
| Received 2024.02.20 | Abstract. The difficult situation in the system of Soviet historical education in the conditions of the “ottepel” is considered in the context of post-non-classics. His inconsistency with his social role was actually officially recognized in the early 1960s. Objectively, this is an alarming sign for the Soviet project with its emphasis on subjectivity. The problem was brought up for wide discussion by the professional community. The focus was on the issues of training pedagogical and scientific-pedagogical personnel. K.N. Tarnovsky, one of the brightest representatives of the A.L. school, was engaged in generalization of developments on the problem. Sidorova, then a “new direction” in Soviet historical science, a talented university teacher from a family of teachers, a front-line soldier, a highly spiritual personality with all the drama of fate. In addition to the impartial and open criticism of the negative sides of the historical and educational reality, he offered his own solutions to the identified problems, the system and methods of training teachers and scientific and pedagogical staff. In the process of analytical comprehension of these developments, both the acute relevance of a number of them for the Soviet era and for modernity (problems of worldview, citizenship) and the dubiousness, especially today, of some of his overstated recommendations are revealed. But the main thing that follows from the analysis of K.N. Tarnovsky’s texts is that his ideas are objectively deeply appropriate to the requirements of post-non-classics, faith in man, in the great task and responsibility of history in the life of society, especially in the era of conscious necessity, opened to the world by the Soviet project. Historical science, history as an educational discipline, is now revealing itself as an essential means of national security, and as a result, planetary security, which was read in the developments of the historian-teacher. |
| Keywords scientific and pedagogical staff, Meeting of historians, history, historical education, challenge of time, era of conscious necessity, responsibility of historians | |
References | |
Acknowledgements | |
| Сведения об авторах Шепелева Валентина Борисовна 1.1 |
| About the authors Shepeleva Valentina B. 1.1 |
